URBAN MOBILITY
“Mobility,
the ability to move around cities is a fundamental and increasingly
complex dimension of everyday life.” (Hall and Barrett 2012) This
mobility Shapes cities.
Mobility In San Fernando |
Movements
in the cities of the global north at least, is increasingly dominated
by the car. And this can also be seen in areas such as San Fernando. The picture above shows San Fernando on a not so busy day, yet you can see illegal parking to the sides of the street, even going straight till the police station.(3rd Photo). The 1st and 2nd photos shows traffic leading up to the CBD, around "Library Corner." Most of which are cars- the preferred vehicle.
There
is a co-relation when it comes to Mobility, Transport and Urban form.
(Hall and Barrett 2012). Urban transportation can be put into three
broad Categories. These includes, Collective, Individual and Freight
transportation. (Rodrigue
2013)
- Collective Transportation (public transit). The purpose of collective transportation is to provide publicly accessible mobility over specific parts of a city. Its efficiency is based upon transporting large numbers of people and achieving economies of scale. It includes modes such as, buses, trains and subways(However not in San Fernando) and ferryboats.
- Individual Transportation. Includes any mode where mobility is the outcome of a personal choice and means such as the automobile, walking, cycling and the motorcycle. The majority of people walk to satisfy their basic mobility, but this number varies according to the city considered. For instance, walking account for 88% of all movements inside Tokyo while this figure is only 3% for Los Angeles. In San Fernando, many people may enter the city with Vehicles, but most of them walk once they are in the CBD fro example, due to lack of proper and sufficient parking facilities.
- Freight Transportation. As cities are dominant centers of production and consumption, urban activities are accompanied by large movements of freight. These movements are mostly characterized by delivery trucks moving between industries, distribution centers, warehouses and retail activities as well as from major terminals such as ports, rail yards, distribution centers and airports. The mobility of freight within cities tends to be overlooked. However, not much of this is seen within the CBD District of San Fernando. However, as you move away from the CBD towards the industrial estates, this can be seen more prevalent.
“Mobility
is also a social equity issue. The share of the automobile in urban
trips varies in relation to location, social status, income, quality
of public transit and parking availability. Mass transit is often
affordable, but several social groups, such as students, the elderly
and the poor are a captive
market.
There are important variations in mobility according to age, income,
gender and disability.” (Rodrigue 2013)
Within
the context of Urban geography, the mobility paradigm highlights
various 'immobile platforms' such as petrol stations, roads, car
parks, airports and docks. These are, but not always, nodes through
which many different forms of mobility are channelled and come
together. (Hall and Barrett 2012)
Increased
Mobility and transportation, has let to road congestion. This can be
seen almost everywhere in urban cities. Road congestion has negative
economic, social, health and environmental impacts that degrade the
natural and built environment. This is also evident in San Fernando.
Addressing
traffic congestion on the Bypass and on the internal roads will have
to respond to the following factors:
- Inability of the critical intersections to handle the volume of traffic.
- Topography, particularly North San Fernando as road routing systems need to improve.
- existing roads which have little capacity for improvement due to roadside development.
- Limited number of arterial roads.
- Irresponsible trade practices by the private transit especially the maxi taxis.
- Pedestrian Jay-walking.
- Insufficient availability of on street space for taxi/maxi stands.
- Insufficient on-street parking space in the Central Business District.
Another
serious problem within San Fernando, is accessibility in the
traditional urban center. Most persons working in San Fernando, live
outside of the city, and commute to work. The hospital also creates
further problems of parking and traffic. Also there are a number of
commuters bringing their children to schools in San Fernando, which
further develops the amount of road congestion.
“LAST
TRAIN TO SAN FERNANDO”
The
event- The song- The myth
"Last Train To San Fernando" |
In
Trinidad and Tobago, trains were once a major form of transportation.
Most
people will tell you that San Fernando’s last service train was
hauled by engine TGR No11 which today is on display at Harris
Promenade, San Fernando, as can be seen in the picture above.
This however is incorrect.
The
Locomotive which hauled the last service train was TGR (Trinidad
Government Railway) Engine No27. This
train really was the very last passenger train to San Fernando.
Over
the years both the event and the song – “The Last Train to San
Fernando” – have become a part of Trinidad folklore, although
largely through myth rather than fact
“In
the calypso there are warnings that if she does not catch the last
train to San Fernando she would be stuck and not be able to get
another one, and her marriage the next day would be in jeopardy.
There is absolutely nothing about a train line coming to an end in
the calypso, but a myth has grown and has become part of Trini
folklore.
It
was after three decades of effort that a passenger railway system was
finally on track. August of 1876 marked the real start of the
passenger railway system in Trinidad that saw Port of Spain linked to
San Juan, St Joseph and Arima.
With
the east-west corridor covered, it was onto Couva by 1880, to serve
the sugar planters in that region, and then in 1882, southwards to
San Fernando. The west coast was now being serviced followed in 1884,
by a line from San Fernando to Princes Town. Travel to hitherto far
off places was finally affordable and available.
Meanwhile,
the cocoa planters, like their central sugar-growing counterparts,
were agitating for extensions from Arima to Guanapo and Sangre
Grande, which were granted in 1896 and 1897 respectively.
The
next phase of the railway system, in 1898, saw the tracks branching
off the southern line, from Cunupia Farm (Jerningham Junction),
through the Caparo Valley and onto Tabaquite.” (Khan 2012)
The
following Video, shows the Song, Last Train to San Fernando.
“The
song became a huge international hit by American Johnny Duncan in
1957. Johnny Duncan’s producer was Dennis Preston who had a
Caribbean wife. She had apparently first drawn the song to Preston’s
attention. It was claimed that the original song was written by the
“Duke of Iron” (Real name was Cecil Anderson) but my information
reveals that “Duke of Iron” was a West Indian performer in the
USA who frequently performed “Last train” making it very popular
abroad. He was not the original composer.
Michael Anthony’s book “Glimpses of Trinidad and Tobago” published in the early 1970s indicates that “Last Train” was composed by MIGHTY SPITFIRE (local Trinidad Calypsonian, whose real name was Carlton Joseph Gumbs) in the 1940s as — “a celebration of a late night stay in Port of Spain rather than the allusion to the closing of the San Fernando line”.
The song was found as the the 1950 Monarch winner, composed by the MIGHTY DICTATOR (Real name was Kenny St Bernard).
As already indicated above, the closure of the line to San Fernando occurred in 1965, a full 15 years after the song won the 1950 Monarch Competition.
Michael Anthony’s book “Glimpses of Trinidad and Tobago” published in the early 1970s indicates that “Last Train” was composed by MIGHTY SPITFIRE (local Trinidad Calypsonian, whose real name was Carlton Joseph Gumbs) in the 1940s as — “a celebration of a late night stay in Port of Spain rather than the allusion to the closing of the San Fernando line”.
The song was found as the the 1950 Monarch winner, composed by the MIGHTY DICTATOR (Real name was Kenny St Bernard).
As already indicated above, the closure of the line to San Fernando occurred in 1965, a full 15 years after the song won the 1950 Monarch Competition.
Nevertheless,
over the years it has certainly taken on a symbolic significance
almost becoming the remembrance anthem for the closure of the Railway
to San Fernando. Perhaps, justifiably so because it is fabled to have
been played by guitarist as the “Last Train to San Fernando”
pulled out of Port of Spain in 1965. “ (Guyanese Online 2011)
In my opinion however, it is very good of the City to keep its heritage/cultural monument. A history that can never be lost. My generation has never seen the light of trains that were once active in the past, and through generations, the appreciation for these artifacts are now being lost. That is why I find it commendable that the City upholds its legacy.
In my opinion however, it is very good of the City to keep its heritage/cultural monument. A history that can never be lost. My generation has never seen the light of trains that were once active in the past, and through generations, the appreciation for these artifacts are now being lost. That is why I find it commendable that the City upholds its legacy.
References
Hall,
Tim, and Heather Barrett. 2012. “The informal economy in Cities –
alternative economic spaces.” Urban
geography.
London: Routledge.
Khan,
Nasser. 2012. "Last Train to San Fernando - But was it?"
The
Guardian Media Limited.
Accessed April 10, 2014.
http://guardian.co.tt/entertainment/2012-12-30/last-train-san-fernando-was-it
Ministry
of Local Government - Home. Accessed April10, 2014.
http://www.localgov.gov.tt/~/media/Resource%20Library/Spatial%20Development%20Plans%20Per%20Corporation/San%20Fernando%20City%20Corporation%20Spatial%20Development%20Plan.ashx.
Rodrigue,
Jean P. "Transportation and the Urban Form." Accessed April
10, 2014.
https://people.hofstra.edu/geotrans/eng/ch6en/conc6en/ch6c1en.html.
I am somewhat flattered with the discovery that most of the description above about the last train to San Fernando was taken directly the description written by me of the video which I posted on YouTube in 2010. I would have been grateful to see listed the appropriate credit. Incidentally, Guyanese Online has nothing to do with the video which they posted on their site in 2011 (at least they credited me accordingly).
ReplyDeleteForgive me for not crediting you,but whatever I wrote was cited from the articles I placed in the references. It was a school project, and a learning experience
Delete